[PATCH] improved error checking in ticks per timeslice

[Gedare Bloom]

On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 10:35 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
> On 17.02.24 18:11, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024, 9:54 PM zack leung <zakthertemsdev at gmail.com
> > <mailto:zakthertemsdev at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     > This file is generated from something in rtems-central. This was at the
> >     > top of the file:
> >     >
> >     >   * This file is part of the RTEMS quality process and was automatically
> >     >   * generated.  If you find something that needs to be fixed or
> >     >   * worded better please post a report or patch to an RTEMS mailing list
> >
> >     No, problem. I can fix this before I check in the patch.
> >
> >     re: this do you need me to change it to something?
> >
> >
> > I'm hoping Sebastian has some guidance for you on what to edit for this
> > and how to propagate it dull.
>
> Just for this patch it would be a bit of on overkill. I will take care
> of this when I check in the patch.
>

Is there a simple way we can add some checks for modification of
generated files into a commit hook? And then, point to a documentation
that helps explain where to go for more guidance depending on the code
generation source?

I would use this for all rtems-central generated stuff, and also for
3rd party sources where there's an active upstream. I can add such a
plan to follow #4663 Third-Party Sources Manifest

Gedare