Continuous Integration - rtbf64c
ralf.corsepius at rtems.org
Fri May 4 06:19:36 UTC 2012
On 05/04/2012 07:52 AM, Thomas Doerfler wrote:
> Chris, it would help understanding the changes, if you can give a brief
> summary what will happen to the rtbf64c installation. Will this machine
> still be available for other tasks?
Openly speaking this mail from Chris upsets me to the maximum, because
he did _not_ communicate nor synchonize his plans to the SC in advance
in any means.
> Is there any specific configuration on that machine that needs
> saving/backing up before the reconfiguration?
> I highly appreciate any suitable effort to get more testing/verification
> done automatically.
> Am 04.05.2012 07:35, schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
>> On 05/04/2012 04:40 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
>>> Any testing or tool building tasks that are not critical should look to
>>> using the other hardware we have available.
>> If this is what I think it is, this will be the end of the RTEMS
>> toolchain binaries.
> I am sure we will have toolchain binaries for the requested host
> platforms in the future. If it is vital for building to have such a
> machine, we might have to look for funding for an additional machine.
This machine is the only one at OAR which has decent enough powers to
build the toolchains. It is the central piece of my works.
Taking it away, mobbes me from RTEMS.
More information about the devel