patch for cpuset test to check for cpuset in newlib
gedare at rtems.org
Fri Feb 21 01:56:30 UTC 2014
I'd like a plan for removing the checks. Perhaps each release cycle
should sweep up these feature checks as the tools get stabilized?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Joel Sherrill
<joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> wrote:
> On 2/20/2014 3:12 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> Do we do this with other newlib features?
> Various configure.ac's have these type of tests in them. I know we
> have code which uses them. It is likely other tests do as well.
> We are trying to ease the bump with older tools and minimize the
> risk that git bisect can't work.
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Jennifer Averett
>> <Jennifer.Averett at oarcorp.com> wrote:
>>> The attached patch adds the check for cpuset.h in newlib
>>> into the cpuset test.
>>> Jennifer Averett
>>> On-Line Applications Research
>>> rtems-devel mailing list
>>> rtems-devel at rtems.org
>> rtems-devel mailing list
>> rtems-devel at rtems.org
> Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
> joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
> Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
> Support Available (256) 722-9985
More information about the devel