Building All Output Formats for RTEMS Docs
Chris Johns
chrisj at rtems.org
Mon Nov 7 22:23:42 UTC 2016
On 07/11/2016 19:27, Christian Mauderer wrote:
>
> with your patch that removes lato and inconsolata, there are now fewer packages necessary on Arch. It is now not longer necessary to install the quite large texlive-fontsextra (nearly 700MB). Beneath that, the pygmentize packet has somehow been lost in my original patch to the README.
>
> I appended a patch that will remove texlive-fontsextra from the Arch Linux section of the README and add pygmentize again.
>
I have taken a closer look at the finished output and it is not as good
which is why the fonts were used before. I am now wondering if we detect
the better fonts and use them when present.
If we move to generate docs based on the lowest common denominator we
may end up with docs that are not the best we could have that reflects
on the project.
Chris
More information about the devel
mailing list