[PATCH] posix: Ignore pshared for semaphores
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Mon Sep 11 14:03:04 UTC 2017
----- Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> schrieb:
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> > Ok, but why do you think that this is an error? We can share the
> > synchronization objects among processes.
> We don't have processes. How do you propose to share between
> processes when RTEMS is fundamentally a single process system.
Yes, its a single process system. So, it is very easy to support sharing between processes. Why should creating a process-shared synchronization object fail only because its impossible to create a second process?
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the devel