[PATCH] posix: Ignore pshared for semaphores

Sebastian Huber sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Tue Sep 12 05:10:20 UTC 2017


On 11/09/17 16:03, Sebastian Huber wrote:

> ----- Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> schrieb:
>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Sebastian Huber <
>> sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok,  but why do you think that this is an error?  We can share the
>>> synchronization objects among processes.
>>>
>> We don't have processes. How do you propose to share between
>> processes when RTEMS is fundamentally a single process system.
> Yes, its a single process system. So, it is very easy to support sharing between processes. Why should creating a process-shared synchronization object fail only because its impossible to create a second process?
>

I would like to remove this process-shared error also from the other 
POSIX synchronization objects:

https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3125
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3126

-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.



More information about the devel mailing list