[PATCH] posix: Ignore pshared for semaphores

[Gedare Bloom]

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 11/09/17 16:03, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>> ----- Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> schrieb:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Sebastian Huber <
>>> sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok,  but why do you think that this is an error?  We can share the
>>>> synchronization objects among processes.
>>>>
>>> We don't have processes. How do you propose to share between
>>> processes when RTEMS is fundamentally a single process system.
>>
>> Yes, its a single process system. So, it is very easy to support sharing
>> between processes. Why should creating a process-shared synchronization
>> object fail only because its impossible to create a second process?
>>
>
> I would like to remove this process-shared error also from the other POSIX
> synchronization objects:
>
> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3125
> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3126
>
Do these process-shared synch objects work properly when used in a
single process on *nix?

> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel