Test suite's minimum sample has no test banners

[Joel Sherrill]

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

> On 20/09/2017 15:08, Chris Johns wrote:
> >
> > Is it worth running? I am wondering about hard coding a filter to not
> run it in
> > rtems-test runs.
> >
>
> I have add test failure exceptions and minimum is the only hard coded
> entry. If
> this test runs and does not time out it is marked as a pass.
>

The intent of this test is to demonstrate the smallest executable and
data size possible.

Looking at the sizes on a few BSPs this morning, I wonder why it is
so large:

  text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
  45792     880    3088   49760    c260 erc32/.../minimum.exe
  49344     888    6896   57128    df28 jmr3904/.../minimum.exe
  66000    1220 16709968        16777188         ffffe4 psim/.../minimum.exe
  76832    1008 268341188       268419028       fffbfd4
xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu/.../minimum.exe

Any ideas where the large .text size is coming from?

--joel

>
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170921/858c074e/attachment-0002.html>