[PATCH v2 2/2] coverage/symbol-sets.ini : Add symbol-sets and paths to respective libraries

[Cillian O'Donnell]

Kryzstof is the original author, so his name should probably stick. You
could add lines for

Reviewed by: Vijay on date: ...

I think that's standard enough

All the best,

Cillian

On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, 17:22 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have a question which I forgot to ask before.
> Should the coverage.py and symbol-sets.ini files have mine and/or
> Cillian's name
> included in the copyright notice?
>
> --vijayk
> On 26 July 2018 at 13:09, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I have added all the libs in cpukit and commented them out.
>> Please have a look at the attached file.
>>
>> On 26 July 2018 at 04:50, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>>> vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>  tester/rtems/testing/coverage/symbol-sets.ini | 11 ++++++++---
>>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/symbol-sets.ini
>>>> b/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/symbol-sets.ini
>>>> index a2ec7bc..3900f14 100644
>>>> --- a/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/symbol-sets.ini
>>>> +++ b/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/symbol-sets.ini
>>>> @@ -29,8 +29,13 @@
>>>>  #
>>>>
>>>>  [symbol-sets]
>>>> -sets = score,rtems
>>>> +sets = score,rtems,libblock,libcrypt,libcsupport,libmd,libnetworking
>>>>
>>>>  [libraries]
>>>> -score = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/score/libscore.a
>>>> -rtems = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/rtems/librtems.a
>>>> +score         = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/score/libscore.a
>>>> +rtems         = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/rtems/librtems.a
>>>> +libblock      = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/libblock/libblock.a
>>>> +libcrypt      = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/libcrypt/libcrypt.a
>>>> +libcsupport   = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@
>>>> /cpukit/libcsupport/libcsupport.a
>>>> +libmd         = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@/cpukit/libmd/libmd.a
>>>> +libnetworking = @BUILD-TARGET@/c/@BSP@
>>>> /cpukit/libnetworking/libnetworking.a
>>>>
>>>
>>> To be at parity with the old reports but reported on finer granularity,
>>> follow the list at
>>>
>>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-testing/tree/rtems-coverage/do_coverage#n507
>>>
>>> and check what is not listed there that is in cpukit now.  For example,
>>> jffs2
>>> isn't listed in the above. But the things consciously skipped have a good
>>> reason. Add a list of the ones not included. It may make sense to
>>> have something like this for the ones deliberately skipped:
>>>
>>> # librpc = @....libXXX.a
>>>
>>> It will make auditing what's in the cpukit versus the ini file easier.
>>> That's why my old script has them in order and commented out the
>>> ones we were not ready to do or never would.
>>>
>>> But for sure, add posix, sapi, libdl, individual filesystem, and catch
>>> the libmisc subdirectories listed in the old script for inclusion. for
>>> new
>>> libmisc content, we can make a decision.
>>>
>>> Don't include libnetworking. As a general rule, we don't do coverage
>>> testing
>>> on networking or any  (complex) third party software.
>>>
>>> I don't think dtc will get coverage either.
>>>
>>> That should get us closer. I expect you will find some libraries
>>> to ask questions on. :)
>>>
>>> --joel
>>>
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.14.4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180726/1e413610/attachment-0002.html>