LIST OF IO BENCHMARKS

[Joel Sherrill]

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Udit agarwal <dev.madaari at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Gedare, Hi Joel,
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>
>> "License type customized" is not clear to me what that means, it would
>> be worth explaining
>>
>>
> In case of IOZONE's license
> <http://www.iozone.org/docs/Iozone_License.txt>,  by customized license
> type, I just mean that it's not one of  standard OSS licenses like GPL, BSD
> etc.
>

I call this an "AS IS vendor" license but apparently, OSI gives something
similar the name Free Public License 1.0.0

https://opensource.org/licenses/FPL-1.0.0

The IOZONE license meets the permissive license requirements for RTEMS.

But again, we could just end up putting a disk_benchmarks directory under
the RSB
(or examples-v2[1]) and include instructions, RTEMS configuration, plus
patches. I
suspect that we will have to consider that an end user will have to
customize the
startup to account for device names, mounting, etc. That leaves the RSB a
less than
ideal situation unless we can figure out how to kit each benchmark properly.

Overall, I am torn on where this code will end up but think it needs to be
public from rtems.org, with easy tailoring and good instructions.

[1] We need to eventually rename this to rtems-examples. :)


> BTW, My domain name's DNS is currently misconfigured, website can be
> accessed from here <http://81.4.107.225/wordpress/>. And for backup, I
> have exported the
> wordpress content to blogger(here <http://nerdyclap.blogspot.in/>).
> (There are some alignment issues after exporting, mainly due to the custom
> CSS i was using, i'll fix that ASAP)
>
> OK. Just pointing it out. :)

--joel


> Regards,
> Udit Agarwal
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, May 19, 2018, 5:06 PM Udit agarwal <dev.madaari at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:19 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Udit,
>> >>>
>> >>> Can you please compare pros/cons of FIO, IOZONE, and Bonnie++,
>> >>> probably in a blog post is a good idea.
>> >>
>> >> Done, here is the comparison.
>> >
>> >
>> > That url has a hard-coded IP address in it. GSoC blogs should be hosted
>> > somewhere where they will have a long life with stable URLs.
>> >
>> > It looks nice though. :)
>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> The GPLv2 is not a problem for test suites / benchmarks. It is only a
>> >>> problem for code that should get merged into the rtems.git.
>> >>>
>> >>> Gedare
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Udit agarwal <dev.madaari at gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > Hi all,
>> >>> > As discussed in yesterday's IRC meeting, here is the list of
>> different
>> >>> > IO
>> >>> > benchmarks(which are supported by FreeBSD) in the decreasing order
>> of
>> >>> > their
>> >>> > popularity  :
>> >>> >
>> >>> > FIO - License type:  GPLv2 - Widely accepted for storage device
>> >>> > benchmarking
>> >>> > IOZONE - License: Customized - Large number of features, Also used
>> for
>> >>> > storage benchmarking
>> >>> > Bonnie++ - GPLv2 - Widely known filesystem benchmark, Not much used
>> for
>> >>> > storage benchmarking.
>> >>> > IOMETER -  GPLv2 - Out of active development.
>> >>> > IORATE - Flexible - Out of active development
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I have performed SDIO-SDHCI performance analysis using IOZONE. Here
>> are
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > results. And i have documented the process on my blog.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Regards,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Udit Agarwal
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > _______________________________________________
>> >>> > devel mailing list
>> >>> > devel at rtems.org
>> >>> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> devel mailing list
>> >> devel at rtems.org
>> >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180521/6e8cf7f8/attachment-0002.html>