[PATCH] libtest: Change expected fail state string
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Wed Dec 4 12:11:04 UTC 2019
On 04/12/2019 12:59, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 3:57 AM Sebastian Huber
> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
>
> On 04/12/2019 09:49, Chris Johns wrote:
> > On 4/12/19 5:43 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >> On 04/12/2019 05:14, Chris Johns wrote:
> >>> On 3/12/19 9:59 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >>>> On 02/12/2019 23:32, Chris Johns wrote:
> >>>>> On 2/12/19 6:24 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >>>>>> Use the value expected by the RTEMS Tester. There are two
> separator
> >>>>>> characters used ('-' and '_') for the states. This is a bit
> >>>>>> inconsistent.
> >>>>> Sorry about this. I had not noticed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c | 2 +-
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c
> b/cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c
> >>>>>> index b739e47b2e..9bdc86780c 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c
> >>>>>> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ rtems_printer rtems_test_printer = {
> >>>>>> static const char* const test_state_strings[] =
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> "EXPECTED-PASS",
> >>>>> Should this change or should `USER_INPUT` be changed and we
> update ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/tester/rt/report.py#n159
> >>>>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/tester/rt/report.py#n161
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It would be a simpler change because this change means we
> move to having 2 with
> >>>>> `_` and a bunch with `-`. There are internal states in the
> tester such as
> >>>>> `WRONG-VERSION` and changing all of those is a bigger change
> in the tester.
> >>>> If we update the tester, then it should accept '-' and '_'
> versions so that it
> >>>> can be used for test runs before and after a change of
> >>>> cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c.
> >>> Yes this is a good point. Shame it has to be this way but I
> cannot see an
> >>> alternative.
> >> I checked in the patch as is. Using only one separator character
> for all states
> >> is just a beautification.
> > That is not what I was meaning. I would like RTEMS master to use
> only '-' and
> > the tester has backward compatibility.
>
> I would change everything to '_' separators since we have also the
> RTEMS
> options:
>
>
> Dashes are often used as separators so can be questionable to use in
> strings intended to be a single token.
Ok, so change "EXPECTED-PASS" to "EXPECTED_PASS", all "-" to "_" in
report.py, and accept [-_] in report.py.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the devel
mailing list