[PATCH] libtest: Change expected fail state string
Chris Johns
chrisj at rtems.org
Thu Dec 5 00:24:26 UTC 2019
On 4/12/19 11:11 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 04/12/2019 12:59, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 3:57 AM Sebastian Huber
>> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
>> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
>>
>> On 04/12/2019 09:49, Chris Johns wrote:
>> > On 4/12/19 5:43 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> >> On 04/12/2019 05:14, Chris Johns wrote:
>> >>> On 3/12/19 9:59 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> >>>> On 02/12/2019 23:32, Chris Johns wrote:
>> >>>>> On 2/12/19 6:24 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> >>>>>> Use the value expected by the RTEMS Tester. There are two
>> separator
>> >>>>>> characters used ('-' and '_') for the states. This is a bit
>> >>>>>> inconsistent.
>> >>>>> Sorry about this. I had not noticed.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> ---
>> >>>>>> cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c | 2 +-
>> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> diff --git a/cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c
>> b/cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c
>> >>>>>> index b739e47b2e..9bdc86780c 100644
>> >>>>>> --- a/cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c
>> >>>>>> +++ b/cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c
>> >>>>>> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ rtems_printer rtems_test_printer = {
>> >>>>>> static const char* const test_state_strings[] =
>> >>>>>> {
>> >>>>>> "EXPECTED-PASS",
>> >>>>> Should this change or should `USER_INPUT` be changed and we
>> update ...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/tester/rt/report.py#n159
>> >>>>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/tester/rt/report.py#n161
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> It would be a simpler change because this change means we
>> move to having 2 with
>> >>>>> `_` and a bunch with `-`. There are internal states in the
>> tester such as
>> >>>>> `WRONG-VERSION` and changing all of those is a bigger change
>> in the tester.
>> >>>> If we update the tester, then it should accept '-' and '_'
>> versions so that it
>> >>>> can be used for test runs before and after a change of
>> >>>> cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c.
>> >>> Yes this is a good point. Shame it has to be this way but I
>> cannot see an
>> >>> alternative.
>> >> I checked in the patch as is. Using only one separator character
>> for all states
>> >> is just a beautification.
>> > That is not what I was meaning. I would like RTEMS master to use
>> only '-' and
>> > the tester has backward compatibility.
>>
>> I would change everything to '_' separators since we have also the
>> RTEMS
>> options:
>>
>>
>> Dashes are often used as separators so can be questionable to use in strings
>> intended to be a single token.
>
> Ok, so change "EXPECTED-PASS" to "EXPECTED_PASS", all "-" to "_" in report.py,
> and accept [-_] in report.py.
Please make sure
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/testing/tests.html#test-controls is
also updated?
Thanks
Chris
More information about the devel
mailing list