[PATCH] libtest: Change expected fail state string
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Thu Dec 5 06:07:07 UTC 2019
On 05/12/2019 01:24, Chris Johns wrote:
>
>
> On 4/12/19 11:11 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 04/12/2019 12:59, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 3:57 AM Sebastian Huber
>>> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
>>> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/12/2019 09:49, Chris Johns wrote:
>>> > On 4/12/19 5:43 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> >> On 04/12/2019 05:14, Chris Johns wrote:
>>> >>> On 3/12/19 9:59 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> >>>> On 02/12/2019 23:32, Chris Johns wrote:
>>> >>>>> On 2/12/19 6:24 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> >>>>>> Use the value expected by the RTEMS Tester. There are two
>>> separator
>>> >>>>>> characters used ('-' and '_') for the states. This is a bit
>>> >>>>>> inconsistent.
>>> >>>>> Sorry about this. I had not noticed.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>> ---
>>> >>>>>> cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c | 2 +-
>>> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c
>>> b/cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c
>>> >>>>>> index b739e47b2e..9bdc86780c 100644
>>> >>>>>> --- a/cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c
>>> >>>>>> +++ b/cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c
>>> >>>>>> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ rtems_printer rtems_test_printer = {
>>> >>>>>> static const char* const test_state_strings[] =
>>> >>>>>> {
>>> >>>>>> "EXPECTED-PASS",
>>> >>>>> Should this change or should `USER_INPUT` be changed and we
>>> update ...
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/tester/rt/report.py#n159
>>> >>>>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/tester/rt/report.py#n161
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> ?
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> It would be a simpler change because this change means we
>>> move to having 2 with
>>> >>>>> `_` and a bunch with `-`. There are internal states in the
>>> tester such as
>>> >>>>> `WRONG-VERSION` and changing all of those is a bigger change
>>> in the tester.
>>> >>>> If we update the tester, then it should accept '-' and '_'
>>> versions so that it
>>> >>>> can be used for test runs before and after a change of
>>> >>>> cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c.
>>> >>> Yes this is a good point. Shame it has to be this way but I
>>> cannot see an
>>> >>> alternative.
>>> >> I checked in the patch as is. Using only one separator character
>>> for all states
>>> >> is just a beautification.
>>> > That is not what I was meaning. I would like RTEMS master to use
>>> only '-' and
>>> > the tester has backward compatibility.
>>>
>>> I would change everything to '_' separators since we have also the
>>> RTEMS
>>> options:
>>>
>>>
>>> Dashes are often used as separators so can be questionable to use in strings
>>> intended to be a single token.
>>
>> Ok, so change "EXPECTED-PASS" to "EXPECTED_PASS", all "-" to "_" in report.py,
>> and accept [-_] in report.py.
>
> Please make sure
> https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/testing/tests.html#test-controls is
> also updated?
I had a look at it. It already uses EXPECTED_FAIL and USER_INPUT. I have
to update the "Test Configuration" for the new build system.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the devel
mailing list