Pre release version: Strong APA Scheduler

[Richi Dubey]

Hi,

Please refer to this patch
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-August/061572.html for
reviewing my code. This new patch has some indentation corrections and
minor code fixes that I missed looking at earlier. The pull request remains
the same and can be used too.

Thank you,
Richi.

On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 3:33 AM Richi Dubey <richidubey at gmail.com> wrote:

> v1 should point to the link:
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-July/060645.html
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 3:27 AM Richi Dubey <richidubey at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am really excited to annonunce the pre-release verion of Strong APA
>> Scheduer for RTEMS that we've been working so hard for!
>>
>> The documentation for the scheduler is now live at :
>> https://richidubey.github.io/Strong-APA-Documentation/html/
>>
>> To understand how the code works, please go through these links (in
>> order):
>>
>> Documentation for Struct defined for various uses
>> <https://richidubey.github.io/Strong-APA-Documentation/html/structScheduler__strong__APA__Struct.html>
>> Changes for Enqueue
>> <https://rtemswithrichi.wordpress.com/scheduler-strong-apa-changes-scheduler_smp_enqueue/>
>> Changes for Get_highest_ready
>> <https://rtemswithrichi.wordpress.com/scheduler-strong-apa-changes-get_highest_ready/>
>>
>> Improvements over v1
>> <https://github.com/richidubey/rtems/blob/9bb37330e2c91a2fbd5bf3236770acb06d3466b3/cpukit/include/rtems/score/schedulersmpimpl.h#L1093> (after
>> last <https://github.com/richidubey/rtems/pull/4> review):
>>
>> - Better coding style and variable naming
>> - Better documentation
>> - Successfully runs the Strong APA test
>> <https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-August/061474.html>
>>
>> Plans for v2:
>>
>> - Use chain of scheduled nodes present in SMP Context rather than per cpu
>> variables based on this
>> <https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-August/061520.html>
>> discussion
>> - Work on the reviews
>>
>> I would request you to provide your reviews on whether the variables
>> names that I chose makes sense (like the array Struct) and if my code
>> follows the coding conventions. Also, please let me know if there's
>> anything that's still looks wrong in the code.
>>
>> Please use this
>> <https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-August/061559.html> patch
>> or this <https://github.com/richidubey/rtems/pull/7> pull request to
>> checkout my changes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Richi.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200824/e6215957/attachment.html>