GSoC 2020: Final Report (Beagle BSP: Add FDT based initialization)

[Christian Mauderer]

On 29/08/2020 15:04, Niteesh G. S. wrote:
> Hello,
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 2:54 PM Christian Mauderer <oss at c-mauderer.de
> <mailto:oss at c-mauderer.de>> wrote:
> 
>     Hello Niteesh
> 
>     On 29/08/2020 11:22, Niteesh G. S. wrote:
>     > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 1:02 PM Christian Mauderer
>     <oss at c-mauderer.de <mailto:oss at c-mauderer.de>
>     > <mailto:oss at c-mauderer.de <mailto:oss at c-mauderer.de>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     On 29/08/2020 05:57, Niteesh G. S. wrote:
>     >     > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 4:19 AM Gedare Bloom
>     <gedare at rtems.org <mailto:gedare at rtems.org>
>     >     <mailto:gedare at rtems.org <mailto:gedare at rtems.org>>
>     >     > <mailto:gedare at rtems.org <mailto:gedare at rtems.org>
>     <mailto:gedare at rtems.org <mailto:gedare at rtems.org>>>> wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     >     Are "Links to commits" 1-4 all the code you (are
>     claiming you)
>     >     wrote?
>     >     >     I just want to make sure. It looks fine to me.
>     >     >
>     >     > Yes, all the code in the commits is written by me.
>     >
>     >     I think maybe "Links to branches" would be a better title. It
>     is not a
>     >     single commit each but a few commits. Alternative would be to
>     add links
>     >     to each commit.
>     >
>     >
>     > I have changed the title to "Links to branches". Should I also add
>     links
>     > to the commits that were made in each phase at the end of the
>     summary of
>     > each phase?
>     >  
> 
>     If you want, you can do that.
> 
> 
> I did try that but it didn't work out well, especially with the OFW commit.
> Since I don't have the old commit I either had to leave that commit out
> in the first phase or I had to post the newer commit in the first phase
> itself which actually should in the last phase. So I decided to avoid adding
> the commits and just leave it out with the branches.

That's OK too. Like I said: Main target was that it's clear that you
don't have four commits but a bit more.

> 
> 
>     The main point of that change was to highlight that it's not 4 commits
>     but a bit more.
> 
>     >
>     >      
>     >
>     >
>     >     It has been quite a bit of back and forth during this GSoC
>     project so I
>     >     think the result is quite OK.
>     >
>     >     Best regards
>     >
>     >     Christian
>     >
>     >     >
>     >     >     On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:07 PM Niteesh G. S.
>     >     <niteesh.gs at gmail.com <mailto:niteesh.gs at gmail.com>
>     <mailto:niteesh.gs at gmail.com <mailto:niteesh.gs at gmail.com>>
>     >     >     <mailto:niteesh.gs at gmail.com
>     <mailto:niteesh.gs at gmail.com> <mailto:niteesh.gs at gmail.com
>     <mailto:niteesh.gs at gmail.com>>>>
>     >     wrote:
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > Hello,
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > I have prepared my final report for my project. You
>     can have a
>     >     >     look at it
>     >     >     > here https://gs-niteesh.github.io/finalreport/. Please
>     kindly
>     >     >     review the report.
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > Thanks,
>     >     >     > Niteesh.
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > _______________________________________________
>     >     > devel mailing list
>     >     > devel at rtems.org <mailto:devel at rtems.org>
>     <mailto:devel at rtems.org <mailto:devel at rtems.org>>
>     >     > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>     >     >
>     >
>