GSoC 2020: Final Report (Beagle BSP: Add FDT based initialization)
Niteesh G. S.
niteesh.gs at gmail.com
Sun Aug 30 06:58:44 UTC 2020
Hello,
I have updated the blog to contain the links to the commits
instead of the branches. Please have a look again.
https://gs-niteesh.github.io/finalreport/
And sorry to disturb on the weekend, but we have only about
a day left before the submission deadline, so I request
everyone to please take a look and let me know if you would
like to change anything.
Thanks,
Niteesh.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 2:24 AM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 8:31 AM Christian Mauderer <oss at c-mauderer.de>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 29/08/2020 15:04, Niteesh G. S. wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 2:54 PM Christian Mauderer <oss at c-mauderer.de
> > > <mailto:oss at c-mauderer.de>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Niteesh
> > >
> > > On 29/08/2020 11:22, Niteesh G. S. wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 1:02 PM Christian Mauderer
> > > <oss at c-mauderer.de <mailto:oss at c-mauderer.de>
> > > > <mailto:oss at c-mauderer.de <mailto:oss at c-mauderer.de>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 29/08/2020 05:57, Niteesh G. S. wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 4:19 AM Gedare Bloom
> > > <gedare at rtems.org <mailto:gedare at rtems.org>
> > > > <mailto:gedare at rtems.org <mailto:gedare at rtems.org>>
> > > > > <mailto:gedare at rtems.org <mailto:gedare at rtems.org>
> > > <mailto:gedare at rtems.org <mailto:gedare at rtems.org>>>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Are "Links to commits" 1-4 all the code you (are
> > > claiming you)
> > > > wrote?
> > > > > I just want to make sure. It looks fine to me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, all the code in the commits is written by me.
> > > >
> > > > I think maybe "Links to branches" would be a better title. It
> > > is not a
> > > > single commit each but a few commits. Alternative would be to
> > > add links
> > > > to each commit.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I have changed the title to "Links to branches". Should I also
> add
> > > links
> > > > to the commits that were made in each phase at the end of the
> > > summary of
> > > > each phase?
> > > >
> > >
> > > If you want, you can do that.
> > >
> > >
> > > I did try that but it didn't work out well, especially with the OFW
> commit.
> > > Since I don't have the old commit I either had to leave that commit out
> > > in the first phase or I had to post the newer commit in the first phase
> > > itself which actually should in the last phase. So I decided to avoid
> adding
> > > the commits and just leave it out with the branches.
> >
> > That's OK too. Like I said: Main target was that it's clear that you
> > don't have four commits but a bit more.
> >
>
> Oh, I'm sorry I didn't notice this. We actually do want it to be
> distinctly your commits. Since you have commits that are older than
> this GSoC in rtems, you can't use the author filtering feature
> (
> https://github.com/gs-niteesh/rtems/commits/beagle-rtems6-pinmux-18-aug?author=gs-niteesh
> )
> so you'll probably need to generate the links to each commit.
>
> This is something required by Google.
>
> > >
> > >
> > > The main point of that change was to highlight that it's not 4
> commits
> > > but a bit more.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It has been quite a bit of back and forth during this GSoC
> > > project so I
> > > > think the result is quite OK.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > >
> > > > Christian
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:07 PM Niteesh G. S.
> > > > <niteesh.gs at gmail.com <mailto:niteesh.gs at gmail.com>
> > > <mailto:niteesh.gs at gmail.com <mailto:niteesh.gs at gmail.com>>
> > > > > <mailto:niteesh.gs at gmail.com
> > > <mailto:niteesh.gs at gmail.com> <mailto:niteesh.gs at gmail.com
> > > <mailto:niteesh.gs at gmail.com>>>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have prepared my final report for my project. You
> > > can have a
> > > > > look at it
> > > > > > here https://gs-niteesh.github.io/finalreport/.
> Please
> > > kindly
> > > > > review the report.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Niteesh.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > devel mailing list
> > > > > devel at rtems.org <mailto:devel at rtems.org>
> > > <mailto:devel at rtems.org <mailto:devel at rtems.org>>
> > > > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200830/f88031c0/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list