Top of file: licence header or Doxygen comment?
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Wed Feb 19 13:03:02 UTC 2020
On 19/02/2020 13:56, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 6:30 AM Sebastian Huber
> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
>
> On 19/02/2020 13:01, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 12:21 AM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org
> <mailto:chrisj at rtems.org>
> > <mailto:chrisj at rtems.org <mailto:chrisj at rtems.org>>> wrote:
> >
> > On 19/2/20 5:18 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > > I want to add a header and source file header template to the
> > RTEMS Software
> > > Engineering manual. What should be on the top of the file? The
> > license header or
> > > the Doxygen file comment block?
> >
> > License header.
> >
> >
> > I think we have existing guidance that is the opposite of that
>
> Yes, should we change it? In other projects, the SPDX License
> Identifier
> is usually on top of the file.
>
>
> I don't want to change existing practice unless someone writes a program
> to verify the order of the first two comment blocks and swap them.
>
> Or (less desirable since it delays changing things a long time) we can
> make a master list of these and make them GCI tasks. But we have trouble
> getting mentors over the holidays. It still may not finish and it will
> be at least a year before potential GCI students could make a dent (and
> likely not fix all).
>
> Write a program or leave the order alone.
I would restrict this task to BSD-2-Clause licensed files with an SDPX
License Identifier.
Changing RTEMS licenced files to BSD-2-Clause is a different issue.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the devel
mailing list