GSoC 2020: Location for FreeBSD files in RTEMS

[Niteesh G. S.]

Hello,

I acknowledge that 2 days is very little time for a reminder mail but
please understand
that this is hampering my progress.

Thanks,
Niteesh.

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:32 PM Niteesh G. S. <niteesh.gs at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> The current directory structure I have been using in my GSoC project
> for the FreeBSD drivers is giving me troubles while installing/including
> the headers.
>
> The current structure of the drivers is as follows
> cpukit/libfreebsd/freebsd --> After this we follow the FreeBSD file
> structure
>
> Eg: ti_pinmux.h is placed under sys/arm/ti/ti_pinmux.h in FreeBSD
>      In RTEMS this is placed under
>      cpukit/libfreebsd/freebsd/sys/arm/ti/ti_pinmux.h
>
> And the files implemented to make porting easier are placed under
> cpukit/libfreebsd/rtems
> You can find these files here
> https://github.com/gs-niteesh/rtems/tree/rtemsbsd/cpukit/libfreebsd/rtems
> I have already started a discussion and written a blog about these files
> please check out
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-July/060541.html
> With the current structure, we aren't able to include the header files in
> BSP and test suite directory.
>
> The spec file for libfreebsd can be found here
>
> https://github.com/gs-niteesh/rtems/blob/pinmux-rtems-6/spec/build/cpukit/objfreebsd.yml
>
> After a discussion regarding this with Christian, he suggested to break out
> of the FreeBSD structure and place the header files under cpukit/include
> and install them with FreeBSD like structure.
> I tried this and was able to include the headers in the BSP and testsuite
> directory.
> On using this approach we have the following structure.
> FreeBSD header files are under
> cpukit/include
> FreeBSD source files under
> cpukit/libfreebsd/freebsd
>
> We will also be using the same approach for the files that have implemented
> to make porting easier.
> All the headers will be placed under
> cpukit/include
> The source files under
> cpukit/libfreebsd/rtems ( Currently we are having only one source file).
>
> I kindly request everyone to quickly provide their feedback on this
> structure
> since this is hampering my progress. If you don't like this structure
> please
> suggest something better.
>
> Thank you,
> Niteesh.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200711/c5ae4fb3/attachment-0001.html>