[PATCH v2 1/2] Changed ARM fenv support similar to RISCV

[Eshan Dhawan]

>> On 27-Jul-2020, at 11:13 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 27/07/2020 07:38, Eshan Dhawan wrote:
> 
>>>>> On 27-Jul-2020, at 10:21 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>>> On 25/07/2020 19:15, Eshan dhawan wrote:
>>>> Removed soft float files
>>>> arm/fenv.c: Fix use of defines and format
>>>> Fix the build.  Remove superfluous code.  Remove parameter names in
>>>> the header file.  Move implementation details out of the header file.
>>>> Patch By : Eshan Dhawan<Eshandhawan51 at gmail.com>  & sebastian huber
>>>> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eshan dhawan<eshandhawan51 at gmail.com>
>>> I think this commit message is not really an improvement compared to the potential v1 of this patch:
>>> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/2020/017780.html
>>> How does this patch differ from the one sent to the Newlib list?
>> This is the same patch as on the newlib list.
> The same patch except the commit message. Why did you change the commit message?
I actually didn’t change the message intentionally.
That’s the message I had on my system 
You had changed it while sending to newlib 
I will change the commit message to the one on newlib 
>> It’s in this series just that the patches could be directly applied to the master.
>> Since the patch on the newlib isn’t yet merged
> Ok, good. Could you please address the minor issues in the patch set and send a v3 to the RTEMS list.