m2006-2 Linux Build Sweep Feedback

[Chris Johns]

> On 21 Jun 2020, at 12:48 am, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> The m2006-2 candidate passed more of the build sweep steps than any of the other candidates.

Great. I will branch the repos tomorrow. 

Thank you for all your testing and reports. They are really helpful and important. 

> The bsp builder sweep of all BSPs and many (1700+) configurations has the normal 6 GCC induced epiphany failures. All but one of the BSP bsets built. atsamv failed:
> 
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2020-June/015864.html 
> 
> Looks like libbsd failed to build for that BSP with this:
> 
> ===========================
> [1875/1925] Linking build/arm-rtems5-atsamv-default/epoch01.exe
> /home/joel/rtems-cron-5.0.0-m2006-2/rtems-source-builder-5.0.0-m2006-2/rtems/build/tmp/sb-1001-staging/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-rtems5/7.5.0/../../../../arm-rtems5/bin/ld:linkcmds.base:326 cannot move location counter backwards (from 000000002047ab60 to 000000002045f000)
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> /home/joel/rtems-cron-5.0.0-m2006-2/rtems-source-builder-5.0.0-m2006-2/rtems/build/tmp/sb-1001-staging/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-rtems5/7.5.0/../../../../arm-rtems5/bin/ld:linkcmds.base:326 cannot move location counter backwards (from 000000002053f9a0 to 000000002045f000)
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> /home/joel/rtems-cron-5.0.0-m2006-2/rtems-source-builder-5.0.0-m2006-2/rtems/build/tmp/sb-1001-staging/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-rtems5/7.5.0/../../../../arm-rtems5/bin/ld:linkcmds.base:326 cannot move location counter backwards (from 000000002053f9a0 to 000000002045f000)
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> Waf: Leaving directory `/home/joel/rtems-cron-5.0.0-m2006-2/rtems-source-builder-5.0.0-m2006-2/rtems/build/rtems-libbsd-d38dbbe18e5315bf69a7c3916d71ef3838d4c20d-x86_64-linux-gnu-1/rtems-libbsd-5.0.0-m2006-2/build/arm-rtems5-atsamv-default'
> Build failed
> ===========================
> 
> No one may read this far but this failure and Jan's Pi2 testing failure appear to be the hurdles now.

That is a shame. Fixes are welcome. 

Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200621/8bdc1df4/attachment.html>