[PATCH v2] rtems: Generate <rtems/io.h>
gedare at rtems.org
Wed Oct 7 19:12:08 UTC 2020
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:40 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 07/10/2020 17:26, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > Thinking about the discussion about ordering directives in the docs,
> > the generated header reorders directives also. Is it also doing
> > generation by alphabetical order?
> > Should we consider using the same order as defined for the API
> > documentation? I guess this would make the Doxygen consistently
> > ordered wrt the docs.
> This would make things a lot more complicated. For the Doxygen we have
> to take also the C language into account. For example before you use a
> type, it must be declared. This is done through automatic dependency
> tracking and a topological sorting. Adding a manual order into this
> stuff would be difficult.
Yeah, maybe. The value of ordering in the headers and doxygen is
probably less than in a manual. We can revisit later if we like. It
shouldn't be too hard in an API header (as opposed to an
implementation header with inlines) to group first the typedefs and
then the function declarations. But I have no real concern about the
ordering here, it was just a thought.
More information about the devel