[PATCH v2] rtems: Generate <rtems/io.h>

[Sebastian Huber]

On 07/10/2020 21:12, Gedare Bloom wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:40 AM Sebastian Huber
> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>> On 07/10/2020 17:26, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>>> Thinking about the discussion about ordering directives in the docs,
>>> the generated header reorders directives also. Is it also doing
>>> generation by alphabetical order?
>>>
>>> Should we consider using the same order as defined for the API
>>> documentation? I guess this would make the Doxygen consistently
>>> ordered wrt the docs.
>> This would make things a lot more complicated. For the Doxygen we have
>> to take also the C language into account. For example before you use a
>> type, it must be declared. This is done through automatic dependency
>> tracking and a topological sorting. Adding a manual order into this
>> stuff would be difficult.
> Yeah, maybe. The value of ordering in the headers and doxygen is
> probably less than in a manual. We can revisit later if we like. It
> shouldn't be too hard in an API header (as opposed to an
> implementation header with inlines) to group first the typedefs and
> then the function declarations. But I have no real concern about the
> ordering here, it was just a thought.

Good, I added a ticket for this:

https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4134#ticket

It is not on my high priority list.