[PATCH 1/2] Added FAQ page

Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Sat Apr 3 23:14:48 UTC 2021

On 3/4/21 6:29 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 12:55 PM Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 1:50 PM Ayushman Mishra <ayushvidushi01 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Sir, It was given as an issue https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3958 (
>>> Review wiki/TBR/Website/FAQ for correct links) for the faq page
>>> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/TBR/Website/FAQ
>> Thanks for confirming that. When Gedare acks the patches as being
>> ok by him, I will see about removing that page and fixing links to it.
>> --joel
>>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 12:10 AM Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 1:19 PM Ayushman Mishra <ayushvidushi01 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Greetings Sir,
>>>>> I have corrected and send patches regarding FAQ page in user manual.I
>>>>> was able to build the page on my system and also attached a
>>>>> screen-shot of the builded page on browser . I have corrected
>>>>> whitespace consistency and reference links according to other
>>>>> doc-pages
>>>> Random question. Is this information from the Wiki or just an update
>>>> of what was already in rtems-docs? If this obsoletes any information
>>>> in the wiki, I would like to know so we can remove it.
>>>>> . Regarding the issue of cross-link between docs , I had
>>>>> sent mail on devel mail list
>>>>> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2021-March/065882.html but
>>>>> haven't got any response , so few days ago after a little discussion
>>>>> on discord vijay sir said to post the patch and someone might point it
>>>>> to a better way if it exists.
>>>> I don't know if we know the answer to that with Sphinx. If "we" do, then
>>>> I am not part of that "we".  Hopefully someone will educate us. :)
>>>> Gedare.. is the new patch OK? It must be in another thread because
>>>> I don't see it here.
>>>> --joel
> Patch needs a little bit of tweaking. It's close.
> The problem with the cross-doc links is that they are wrong for a
> release doc. I don't think we have determined what is the proper
> solution to follow yet. They also don't populate the section numbers
> in PDF builds, so all you get is the URL and if you have printed
> manuals (does anyone do that?) you might not be able to find what you
> want. There's no good answer to this problem though, so I'm ok with
> merging the patch after the other issues get addressed, but we're
> probably adding more effort to the release/post-release procedures
> until someone sorts out how to do cross-doc links in a useful way.

Sorry no crosslinking.


More information about the devel mailing list