[PATCH 20/41] sparc/irq: Implement new interrupt directives
Gedare Bloom
gedare at rtems.org
Wed Jul 21 18:28:23 UTC 2021
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 6:50 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
> Update #3269.
> ---
> bsps/sparc/leon3/start/eirq.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> bsps/sparc/shared/irq/irq-shared.c | 17 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bsps/sparc/leon3/start/eirq.c b/bsps/sparc/leon3/start/eirq.c
> index d6373bf00a..4f5f910106 100644
> --- a/bsps/sparc/leon3/start/eirq.c
> +++ b/bsps/sparc/leon3/start/eirq.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,19 @@ rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_get_attributes(
> rtems_interrupt_attributes *attributes
> )
> {
> + bool is_standard_interrupt;
> +
> + is_standard_interrupt = (vector <= BSP_INTERRUPT_VECTOR_MAX_STD);
> + attributes->is_maskable = (vector != 15);
> + attributes->can_enable = true;
> + attributes->maybe_enable = true;
> + attributes->can_disable = true;
> + attributes->can_cause = true;
> + attributes->can_cause_on = is_standard_interrupt;
> + attributes->can_clear = true;
> + attributes->cleared_by_acknowledge = true;
> + attributes->can_get_affinity = is_standard_interrupt;
> + attributes->can_set_affinity = is_standard_interrupt;
> return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> }
>
> @@ -74,16 +87,56 @@ rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_is_pending(
> bool *pending
> )
> {
> +#if defined(RTEMS_SMP)
> + rtems_interrupt_level level;
> + uint32_t bit;
> +
> bsp_interrupt_assert(bsp_interrupt_is_valid_vector(vector));
> bsp_interrupt_assert(pending != NULL);
> - *pending = false;
> - return RTEMS_UNSATISFIED;
> + bit = 1U << vector;
> +
> + rtems_interrupt_local_disable(level);
> + *pending = (LEON3_IrqCtrl_Regs->ipend & bit) != 0 ||
> + (LEON3_IrqCtrl_Regs->force[rtems_scheduler_get_processor()] & bit) != 0;
> + rtems_interrupt_local_enable(level);
> + return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> +#else
> + bsp_interrupt_assert(bsp_interrupt_is_valid_vector(vector));
> + *pending = !BSP_Is_interrupt_pending(vector);
> + return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> +#endif
> }
>
> rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_cause(rtems_vector_number vector)
> {
> + uint32_t bit;
> +
> bsp_interrupt_assert(bsp_interrupt_is_valid_vector(vector));
> - return RTEMS_UNSATISFIED;
> + bit = 1U << vector;
> +
> + if ( vector <= BSP_INTERRUPT_VECTOR_MAX_STD ) {
> + uint32_t cpu_count;
> + uint32_t cpu_index;
> +
> + cpu_count = rtems_scheduler_get_processor_maximum();
> +
> + for (cpu_index = 0; cpu_index < cpu_count; ++cpu_index) {
> + LEON3_IrqCtrl_Regs->force[cpu_index] = bit;
> + }
> + } else {
Why not throw an error here instead? In production, you wouldn't want
this code...
> + rtems_interrupt_lock_context lock_context;
> +
> + /*
> + * This is a very dangerous operation and should only be used for test
> + * software. We may accidentally clear the pending state set by
> + * peripherals with this read-modify-write operation.
> + */
> + LEON3_IRQCTRL_ACQUIRE(&lock_context);
> + LEON3_IrqCtrl_Regs->ipend |= bit;
> + LEON3_IRQCTRL_RELEASE(&lock_context);
> + }
> +
> + return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> }
>
> #if defined(RTEMS_SMP)
> @@ -93,14 +146,31 @@ rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_cause_on(
> )
> {
> bsp_interrupt_assert(bsp_interrupt_is_valid_vector(vector));
> - return RTEMS_UNSATISFIED;
> + bsp_interrupt_assert(cpu_index < rtems_scheduler_get_processor_maximum());
> +
> + if ( vector > BSP_INTERRUPT_VECTOR_MAX_STD ) {
> + return RTEMS_UNSATISFIED;
> + }
> +
> + LEON3_IrqCtrl_Regs->force[cpu_index] = 1U << vector;
> + return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> }
> #endif
>
> rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_clear(rtems_vector_number vector)
> {
> + uint32_t bit;
> +
> bsp_interrupt_assert(bsp_interrupt_is_valid_vector(vector));
> - return RTEMS_UNSATISFIED;
> + bit = 1U << vector;
> +
> + LEON3_IrqCtrl_Regs->iclear = bit;
> +
> + if (vector <= BSP_INTERRUPT_VECTOR_MAX_STD) {
> + LEON3_IrqCtrl_Regs->force[rtems_scheduler_get_processor()] = bit << 16;
> + }
> +
> + return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> }
>
> rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_vector_is_enabled(
> @@ -109,9 +179,9 @@ rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_vector_is_enabled(
> )
> {
> bsp_interrupt_assert(bsp_interrupt_is_valid_vector(vector));
> - bsp_interrupt_assert(enabled != NULL);
> - *enabled = false;
> - return RTEMS_UNSATISFIED;
> + *enabled =
> + !BSP_Cpu_Is_interrupt_masked(vector, _LEON3_Get_current_processor());
> + return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> }
>
> #if defined(RTEMS_SMP)
> diff --git a/bsps/sparc/shared/irq/irq-shared.c b/bsps/sparc/shared/irq/irq-shared.c
> index aa1d412be0..d0b77bddbb 100644
> --- a/bsps/sparc/shared/irq/irq-shared.c
> +++ b/bsps/sparc/shared/irq/irq-shared.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,13 @@ rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_get_attributes(
> rtems_interrupt_attributes *attributes
> )
> {
> + attributes->is_maskable = vector != 15;
> + attributes->can_enable = true;
> + attributes->can_disable = true;
> + attributes->can_cause = true;
> + attributes->can_cause_on = true;
> + attributes->can_clear = true;
> + attributes->can_set_affinity = true;
> return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> }
>
> @@ -54,7 +61,8 @@ rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_is_pending(
> rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_cause(rtems_vector_number vector)
> {
> bsp_interrupt_assert(bsp_interrupt_is_valid_vector(vector));
> - return RTEMS_UNSATISFIED;
> + BSP_Force_interrupt(vector);
> + return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> }
>
> #if defined(RTEMS_SMP)
> @@ -71,7 +79,8 @@ rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_cause_on(
> rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_clear(rtems_vector_number vector)
> {
> bsp_interrupt_assert(bsp_interrupt_is_valid_vector(vector));
> - return RTEMS_UNSATISFIED;
> + BSP_Clear_interrupt(vector);
> + return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> }
>
> rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_vector_is_enabled(
> @@ -81,8 +90,8 @@ rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_vector_is_enabled(
> {
> bsp_interrupt_assert(bsp_interrupt_is_valid_vector(vector));
> bsp_interrupt_assert(enabled != NULL);
> - *enabled = false;
> - return RTEMS_UNSATISFIED;
> + *enabled = !BSP_Cpu_Is_interrupt_masked(vector, bsp_irq_cpu(vector));
> + return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> }
>
> rtems_status_code bsp_interrupt_vector_enable(rtems_vector_number vector)
> --
> 2.26.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
More information about the devel
mailing list