ttcp only on 6-freebsd-12 and not on master of libbsd
Joel Sherrill
joel at rtems.org
Sat Jul 24 20:02:02 UTC 2021
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021, 1:55 PM Christian Mauderer <oss at c-mauderer.de> wrote:
> Hello Joel,
>
> I wrote a short script to find different commits based on author and
> subject (see attached python-script). It seems that there are quite some
> differences (see attached output).
>
Quick work!
>
> The big blog of HDMI on Beagle patches that is only on master is caused
> by me. These have been developed by Vijay while I was a mentor for his
> project. Would be a question whether that's a feature that should be on
> the stable branch too or not. Some commits will be most likely only on
> one branch (for example 816a2f912f where Chris updated rtems_waf).
>
Anything 5 is stable. I would personally say it's ok to merge Vijay's work
to 6-freebsd-12.
The biggest consideration for me is not negatively impacting Chris sorting
out merging NFSv4 and all that comes along with that. But this should be
independent.
--joel
>
> Best regards
>
> Christian
>
> On 24/07/2021 18:40, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021, 11:30 AM Christian Mauderer <oss at c-mauderer.de
> > <mailto:oss at c-mauderer.de>> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Joel,
> >
> > On 24/07/2021 18:18, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021, 10:19 AM Christian Mauderer
> > <oss at c-mauderer.de <mailto:oss at c-mauderer.de>
> > > <mailto:oss at c-mauderer.de <mailto:oss at c-mauderer.de>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > in a discussion with Husni I noted that the patches adding
> > ttcp are
> > > only
> > > on the 6-freebsd-12 branch of libbsd. Is there a reason that
> > they are
> > > not on master too?
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes but forgetting isn't a good reason. I know I have a recent
> > patch so
> > > apps using C99 or C++03 can compile using libbsd missing also. I
> > will
> > > survey OAR and make sure we catch up.
> >
> > I missed something like that in the past too and I will miss it in
> the
> > future. And I'm sure that I have some on master that are not on
> > 6-freebsd-12. So no problem. Just wanted to check that there is no
> > other
> > reason.
> >
> >
> > We probably need to collectively be more diligent about asking that any
> > patches go onto 6-freedbsd-12 and master. Some also should go to
> > 5-freebsd-12. We are all busy and just forget.
> >
> >
> > By the way: Please tell me if you find patches that I missed ;-)
> >
> >
> > I would if we can figure.out how to spot them.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Is there any reason rtemsbsd/ just shouldn't be the same?
> > >
> >
> > Most of it most likely is the same. But there are differences. Some
> of
> > them might shouldn't be there but they are there. Try to checkout
> > master
> > and do a
> >
> > git diff 6-freebsd-12 -- rtemsbsd/
> >
> > I don't think that someone wants to clean that up on an update.
> >
> >
> > Is it possible to take the output of that and do a git blame on the
> > 6-freebsd-12 branch, grab the hash and author, and generate a master
> > list of hashes and who was responsible for review?
> >
> > It would make the audit easier.
> >
> > Changes to the FreeBSD directory might be harder. I know Kinsey back
> > ported some stuff.
> >
> > --joel
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Christian
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=af06b267c5ce04e8a4a7719cb0c723ee4a27f4b4
> > <
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=af06b267c5ce04e8a4a7719cb0c723ee4a27f4b4
> >
> > >
> > <
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=af06b267c5ce04e8a4a7719cb0c723ee4a27f4b4
> <
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=af06b267c5ce04e8a4a7719cb0c723ee4a27f4b4
> >>
> > >
> >
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=7960ab7a43d5a7c6ceccdd67f8e379adfce7a633
> > <
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=7960ab7a43d5a7c6ceccdd67f8e379adfce7a633
> >
> > >
> > <
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=7960ab7a43d5a7c6ceccdd67f8e379adfce7a633
> <
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=7960ab7a43d5a7c6ceccdd67f8e379adfce7a633
> >>
> > >
> >
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=6cc63cbe657c3ee664727cce1a54acc7e7b5fe9d
> > <
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=6cc63cbe657c3ee664727cce1a54acc7e7b5fe9d
> >
> > >
> > <
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=6cc63cbe657c3ee664727cce1a54acc7e7b5fe9d
> <
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=6cc63cbe657c3ee664727cce1a54acc7e7b5fe9d
> >>
> > >
> >
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=8dfea31d729fafab69b5cf1846598f5104b0faeb
> > <
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=8dfea31d729fafab69b5cf1846598f5104b0faeb
> >
> > >
> > <
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=8dfea31d729fafab69b5cf1846598f5104b0faeb
> <
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=8dfea31d729fafab69b5cf1846598f5104b0faeb
> >>
> > >
> > > Background for the question: I expect that an update to
> > FreeBSD 13 will
> > > use only what is on the master branch. That's basically what
> > master is
> > > for: Tracking the development to keep up with new stuff in
> > FreeBSD and
> > > make it easy to jump to the next FreeBSD release. In other
> > words: I
> > > think a (possible future) 6-freebsd-13 branch will be based
> > on master
> > > and not on 6-freebsd-12. Am I wrong with that assumption?
> > >
> > > Again: please correct me if I'm wrong but with that in mind I
> > would say
> > > that it is a good idea to port to master and 6-freebsd-12 or
> (for
> > > experimental stuff) only to master. But not only to
> 6-freebsd-12.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > Christian
> > >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20210724/5c015b41/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list