[PATCH rtems-docs v2 3/6] rtems-docs: Edit command to install toolsuite
Ida Delphine
idadelm at gmail.com
Wed Mar 17 20:37:30 UTC 2021
Ok, I will do that.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 7:56 PM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:16 PM Ida Delphine <idadelm at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I ran the commands and copied and pasted wherever there were mismatches
> especially with respect to the version numbers.
> >
> OK, I noticed some inconsistencies and was wondering. It would be
> better to provide the actual output for the entire snippets, see
> further below what I noticed.
>
> > Should I resend the patchset with a better commit message?
> >
> Yes. I think it would be better to also update the entire output
> examples, and to separate them from the manual changes you make to the
> version numbers. In other words, update the version numbers by hand
> for some things, and update the console output examples separately.
> You can put multiple changes together in one patch that are related,
> for example you might just send one patch with all the console output
> example updates.
>
> > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, 6:50 pm Gedare Bloom, <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ida,
> >>
> >> Since the patches now indicate rtems-docs, you don't need to include
> >> that in the commit message. Instead, it is recommended to put the
> >> manual directory name that is modified as the first part of the
> >> commit, e.g., "user: bump version 5 to 6 in start/tools.rst"
> >>
> >> More below:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 2:16 AM Ida Delphine <idadelm at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Edit edit sample output of tool suite installation.
> >> > Edit command to check if C cross compiler works and sample output of
> this command.
> >> > ---
> >> > user/start/tools.rst | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> >> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/user/start/tools.rst b/user/start/tools.rst
> >> > index baa2387..9a915ab 100644
> >> > --- a/user/start/tools.rst
> >> > +++ b/user/start/tools.rst
> >> > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Install the Tool Suite
> >> >
> >> > You have chosen an installation prefix, the BSP to build, the tool's
> >> > architecure and prepared the source for the RSB in the previous
> sections. We
> unrelated, fix typo: architecture
>
> >> > -have chosen :file:`$HOME/quick-start/rtems/5` as the installation
> prefix, the
> >> > +have chosen :file:`$HOME/quick-start/rtems/6` as the installation
> prefix, the
> >> > ``erc32`` BSP and the SPARC architecture name of ``sparc-rtems5``,
> and unpacked
> >> > the RSB source in :file:`$HOME/quick-start/src`.
> >> >
> >> > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Build and install the tool suite:
> >> > .. code-block:: none
> >> >
> >> > cd $HOME/quick-start/src/rsb/rtems
> >> > - ../source-builder/sb-set-builder
> --prefix=$HOME/quick-start/rtems/5 5/rtems-sparc
> >> > + ../source-builder/sb-set-builder
> --prefix=$HOME/quick-start/rtems/6 6/rtems-sparc
> >> >
> >> > This command should output something like this (omitted lines are
> denoted by
> >> > ...). The build host appears as part of the name of the package being
> >> > @@ -33,19 +33,19 @@ built. The name you see may vary depending on the
> host you are using:
> >> >
> >> > .. code-block:: none
> >> >
> >> > - RTEMS Source Builder - Set Builder, 5.1.0
> >> > - Build Set: 5/rtems-sparc
> >> > + RTEMS Source Builder - Set Builder, 6
> >> > + Build Set: 6/rtems-sparc
> >> > ...
> >> > config: tools/rtems-binutils-2.34.cfg
> >> > - package: sparc-rtems5-binutils-2.34-x86_64-freebsd12.1-1
> >> > - building: sparc-rtems5-binutils-2.34-x86_64-freebsd12.1-1
> >> > - sizes: sparc-rtems5-binutils-2.34-x86_64-freebsd12.1-1:
> 305.866MB (installed: 29.966MB)
> >> > - cleaning: sparc-rtems5-binutils-2.34-x86_64-freebsd12.1-1
> >> > + package: sparc-rtems6=-binutils-2.34-x86_64-freebsd12.1-1
>
> The = sign here is what got me thinking something odd is going on.
> Please copy-paste the entire output/snippet you get, and update the
> examples completely so that each snippet is self-consistent at least.
>
> >> > + building: sparc-rtems6-binutils-2.34-x86_64-freebsd12.1-1
> >> > + sizes: sparc-rtems6-binutils-2.34-x86_64-freebsd12.1-1:
> 305.866MB (installed: 29.966MB)
> >> > + cleaning: sparc-rtems6-binutils-2.34-x86_64-freebsd12.1-1
> >> > reporting: tools/rtems-binutils-2.34.cfg ->
> sparc-rtems5-binutils-2.34-x86_64-freebsd12.1-1.txt
> >> > reporting: tools/rtems-binutils-2.34.cfg ->
> sparc-rtems5-binutils-2.34-x86_64-freebsd12.1-1.xml
> >> > config: tools/rtems-gcc-7.5.0-newlib-fbaa096.cfg
> >> > - package:
> sparc-rtems5-gcc-7.5.0-newlib-fbaa096-x86_64-freebsd12.1-1
> >> > - building:
> sparc-rtems5-gcc-7.5.0-newlib-fbaa096-x86_64-freebsd12.1-1
> >> > + package:
> sparc-rtems6-gcc-7.5.0-newlib-fbaa096-x86_64-freebsd12.1-1
> >> > + building:
> sparc-rtems6-gcc-7.5.0-newlib-fbaa096-x86_64-freebsd12.1-1
> >> > ....
> >> > Build Sizes: usage: 5.684GB total: 1.112GB (sources: 143.803MB,
> patches: 21.348KB, installed 995.188MB)
> >> > Build Set: Time 0:21:35.626294
> >>
> >> Did you run the command and capture the sample output, or do you edit
> >> the sample output manually?
> >>
> >> It would be better to copy-paste the actual sample output. Making this
> >> version change update automatic could be a nice small scripting
> >> exercise.
> >>
> >> > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ works with the following command:
> >> >
> >> > .. code-block:: none
> >> >
> >> > - $HOME/quick-start/rtems/5/bin/sparc-rtems5-gcc --version
> >> > + $HOME/quick-start/rtems/6/bin/sparc-rtems6-gcc --version
> >> >
> >> > This command should output something like below. The version
> informtion helps
> >> Unrelated, but can you fix this typo: information
> >>
> >> > you to identify the exact sources used to build the cross compiler
> of your
> >> > @@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ source code used.
> >> >
> >> > .. code-block:: none
> >> >
> >> > - sparc-rtems5-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0 20191114 (RTEMS 5, RSB 5.1.0,
> Newlib fbaa096)
> >> > - Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> >> > + sparc-rtems6-gcc (GCC) 10.2.1 20210309 (RTEMS 6, RSB
> 5e449fb5c2cb6812a238f9f9764fd339cbbf05c2, Newlib d10d0d9)
> >> > + Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> >> > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
> There is NO
> >> > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
> PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > 2.25.1
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > devel mailing list
> >> > devel at rtems.org
> >> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20210317/51ad4a3e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list