Two Resource Leaks
joel at rtems.org
Sat Mar 27 18:45:23 UTC 2021
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021, 1:38 PM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 27/03/2021 17:20, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021, 11:07 AM Sebastian Huber
> > <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> > <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
> > On 27/03/2021 16:08, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > > The issue I found is different and won't happen on every
> > target or
> > > bsp.
> > >
> > > Psim has 6-9 failures even after freeing the right stack
> > address.
> > >
> > >
> > > The stack address and now (I think) size saved for later use are
> > wrong
> > > and this leads to multiple failures.
> > I work on a fix. psim seems to be a good platform for these tests.
> > I put a patch for the address issue but I think the fundamental issue
> > is you changed the semantics of what was stored in the stack
> > structure. You probably want a different approach but this is at least
> > a good temporary fix.
> I checked in a fix. However, I still get two unexpected failures:
> A rtems_resource_snapshot_check() is not happy.
Did you manage to see what was leaking?
And did you try the non-network tests in libbsd. Those failing on beatnik
is what caused me to start looking at psim. Syscalls01 was a workspace
mismatch on the resource check.
> embedded brains GmbH
> Herr Sebastian HUBER
> Dornierstr. 4
> 82178 Puchheim
> email: sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
> fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
> Registernummer: HRB 157899
> Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
> Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel