more gnat/rtems ACATS results

[Joel Sherrill]

I have added dummy versions of getpagesize() and mprotect() and
now the "a" tests are 75/75.  I should be able to post full sparc
results tomorrow and expect them to match the powerpc.

--joel

Joel Sherrill wrote:

> In rev'ing the RPMs to add more CPUs, I got more
> ACATS results. :)
> 
> SPARC/erc32
> 
> acats4gnat results cz 3 /       4
> acats4gnat results a 63 /      75
> acats4gnat results c2 35 /      35
> acats4gnat results c3 329 /     349
> acats4gnat results c4 323 /     338
> acats4gnat results c5 93 /      95
> acats4gnat results c6 78 /      81
> acats4gnat results c7 44 /      50
> acats4gnat results c8 118 /     140
> acats4gnat results c9 38 /     255
> acats4gnat results ca 73 /      74
> acats4gnat results cb 36 /      43
> acats4gnat results cc 106 /     117
> acats4gnat results cd 162 /     172
> acats4gnat results ce 262 /     268
> acats4gnat results cxa 80 /      85
> acats4gnat results cxb 29 /      30
> acats4gnat results cxc 7 /      16
> acats4gnat results cxd 6 /      39
> acats4gnat results cxe 1 /       1
> acats4gnat results cxf 19 /      20
> acats4gnat results cxg 26 /      29
> acats4gnat results cxh 4 /       4
> acats4gnat results d 4 /       4
> acats4gnat results e 11 /      11
> acats4gnat results l 25 /      26
> 
> This compares pretty favorably with the PowerPC/psim
> reported earlier:
> 
> acats4gnat results cz 3 /       4
> acats4gnat results a 75 /      75
> acats4gnat results c2 35 /      35
> acats4gnat results c3 347 /     349
> acats4gnat results c4 333 /     338
> acats4gnat results c5 95 /      95
> acats4gnat results c6 81 /      81
> acats4gnat results c7 47 /      50
> acats4gnat results c8 140 /     140
> acats4gnat results c9 246 /     255
> acats4gnat results ca 73 /      74
> acats4gnat results cb 43 /      43
> acats4gnat results cc 117 /     117
> acats4gnat results cd 172 /     172
> acats4gnat results ce 262 /     268
> acats4gnat results cxa 85 /      85
> acats4gnat results cxb 29 /      30
> acats4gnat results cxc 9 /      16
> acats4gnat results cxd 27 /      39
> acats4gnat results cxe 1 /       1
> acats4gnat results cxf 20 /      20
> acats4gnat results cxg 28 /      29
> acats4gnat results cxh 4 /       4
> acats4gnat results d 4 /       4
> acats4gnat results e 11 /      11
> acats4gnat results l 26 /      26
> 
> More than one sparc test fails to link because the
> sparc trampoline code references mprotect() and
> getpagesize() which don't exist on RTEMS.  There
> appear to be able 350 undefined reference errors 
> for mprotect() in the run log which correlates
> with the failures nicely. :)
> 
> FWIW I had the following error trying to build
> i386-rtemscoff RPMs.  Any ideas?
> opt/usr_src_redhat_BUILD/i386-rtemscoff-gnat-newlib/build/gcc/xgcc
> -B/opt/usr_src_redhat_BUILD/i386-rtemscoff-gnat-newlib/build/gcc/
> -DCROSS_COMPILE -DIN_GCC    -O2 -I./include  libgcc1-test.o -o
> libgcc1-test \
>   -nostartfiles -nostdlib
> `/opt/usr_src_redhat_BUILD/i386-rtemscoff-gnat-newlib/build/gcc/xgcc
> -B/opt/usr_src_redhat_BUILD/i386-rtemscoff-gnat-newlib/build/gcc/
> --print-libgcc-file-name`
> /opt/usr_src_redhat_BUILD/i386-rtemscoff-gnat-newlib/build/gcc/libgcc.a:
> could not read symbols: Archive has no index; run ranlib to add one
> make[1]: *** [libgcc1-test] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/opt/usr_src_redhat_BUILD/i386-rtemscoff-gnat-newlib/build/gcc'
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel at OARcorp.com                 On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available                (256) 722-9985