IRQ latency and context switching on mvme5500 (was Re: RTEMS mvme5500 bsp)
feng1 at bnl.gov
Thu Jul 28 02:29:57 UTC 2005
Kate Feng wrote:
> > Interested, yes, but I really have no time right now
> > to have a closer look at it -- can you summarize the results?
> Based on the test result, it shows that RTEMS-mvme5500 is
> more deterministic and steadier than vxWorks-mvme5500
> for the highest priority task. For both the idle and loaded system,
> RTEMS-mvme5500 "GUARANTEED" twice or three times
> faster response time in a steadier state.
I meant for the worst case. -- Kate
> The "worst case" is a
> critical factor in consideration of the real-time system.
More information about the users