MVME5500 board support status?

[Kate Feng]

"Joel Sherrill " wrote:

> Kate Feng wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 at 07:21:43 AM, Kate Feng wrote :
> >
> >
> >>The tools I used for
> >>the 4.6.0 version I posted on the WEB are :
> >
> >
> >>binutils-2.13.2.1
> >>gcc-3.2.2
> >>newlib-1.11.0
> >
> >  > automake-1.9.2  (from GNU site)
> >
> >>autoconf-2.59   (from GNU site)
> >
> >
> > While retrieving back information from the mailing list
> > for my own reference, I realized that I made an honest  and
> > obvious mistake.  Others know better about tools than me.
> > However,   here is to get the record straight:
> >
> > All the tools were obtained from the RTEMS web site.
> >
> > The  automake-1.9.2  and autoconf-2.59   were downloaded
> > form the RTEMS site while I was trying RTEMS4.7
> > in 2003.  For  the  4.6.0 version I posted on the WEB, I used
> >
> >  autoconf-2.57
> >  automake-1.7.2
> >
> > However, it was reported that the new tools  from the
> > current RTEMS site  works on the RTEMS-4.6.0-MVME5500
> > as well.
>
> So has someone actually tried a gcc 4.0.x with the mvme5500?
> Most BSPs have worked fine with gcc 4.0.x but a few have been optimized
> into breaking. :)
>

The tools used for the RTEMS-4.6.0-MVME5500 posted on
http://www.nsls.bnl.gov/organization/UserScience/Detectors/Software
are :

binutils-2.13.2.1
gcc-3.2.3
newlib-1.11.0
automake-1.9.5
autoconf-2.59

and all the patches from the RTEMS site.

Kate