MVME5500 board support status?
dufault at hda.com
Thu Oct 27 15:35:24 UTC 2005
On Oct 27, 2005, at 7:29 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> So has someone actually tried a gcc 4.0.x with the mvme5500?
> Most BSPs have worked fine with gcc 4.0.x but a few have been
> optimized into breaking. :)
Yes, I've done all my mvme5500 work with 4.0.x. It was one of the
BSPS that was optimized into breaking...
But I haven't updated from CVS in a long time.
I'm currently trying to get the cvs head on Solaris, but at a very
low level since other things keep getting in the way. The last thing
I got was "powerpc-rtems-gcc: new-exceptions/cpu_asm.o: No such file
or directory" building RTEMS even though I'm using:
More information about the users