ERC32 with FPU rev.B or rev.C

[Zandin Johan RUAG]

Good! I guess this means that the fix in irq_asm.S line 426 is at least not needed for TSC695F.

/Johan

Johan Zandin
Computer Engineer

RUAG Space AB
SE-405 15 Göteborg · Sweden 
Tel. +46 31 735 41 47
johan.zandin at ruag.com
www.ruag.se



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jiri Gaisler [mailto:jiri at gaisler.se]
>Sent: torsdag den 6 mars 2014 13:50
>To: Zandin Johan RUAG; Sebastian Huber; RTEMS
>Subject: Re: ERC32 with FPU rev.B or rev.C
>
>
>
>On 03/06/2014 12:02 PM, Zandin Johan RUAG wrote:
>> That depends. Which FPU revision is present in the TSC695F chip?
>> That one is used in a lot of ESA missions, but I can't find any FPU revision
>information in its documentation...
>
>The errata for TSC695F is here:
>
>http://aerosupport.atmel.com/Atmel/doc4280.pdf
>
>The old FPU bugs are removed, although there is a new one that needs to
>fixed at compiler level rather then in RTEMS ...
>
>Jiri.
>
>
>>
>> Johan Zandin
>> Computer Engineer
>>
>> RUAG Space AB
>> SE-405 15 Göteborg · Sweden
>> Tel. +46 31 735 41 47
>> johan.zandin at ruag.com
>> www.ruag.se
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: rtems-users-bounces at rtems.org [mailto:rtems-users-
>>> bounces at rtems.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Huber
>>> Sent: onsdag den 5 mars 2014 09:25
>>> To: RTEMS; RTEMS
>>> Subject: ERC32 with FPU rev.B or rev.C
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> there is a fix for the ERC32 with FPU rev.B or rev.C in the SPARC
>>> interrupt entry code:
>>>
>>> http://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/shared/irq_asm
>>> .S#n4
>>> 26
>>>
>>> Exists there systems with such a processor?  Is it reasonable to ship
>>> RTEMS
>>> 4.11 or later on such a system?
>>>
>>> I would like to remove this code block.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>>>
>>> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
>>> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
>>> Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
>>> E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
>>> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>>>
>>> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtems-users mailing list
>>> rtems-users at rtems.org
>>> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtems-users mailing list
>> rtems-users at rtems.org
>> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>>