Creating older RTEMS5 tools

[Joel Sherrill]

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:51 AM Ian Caddy <ianc at goanna.iinet.net.au> wrote:

> I guess to answer my own question after I have had a bit more of a look
> into this, I assume it would be OK to change the build set?
>
> I am building for the arm platform so it uses the "rtems-default.bset"
>
> On my July 18 system this is:
>
> 5/rtems-autotools
> devel/expat-2.1.0-1
> tools/rtems-binutils-2.30
> tools/rtems-gcc-7.3.0-newlib-3.0.0
> tools/rtems-gdb-8.0.1-1
> tools/rtems-tools-5-1
> tools/rtems-kernel-5
>
> On my Dec 18 MSYS2 system it is:
>
> 5/rtems-autotools
> devel/expat-2.1.0-1
> tools/rtems-gdb-8.0.1-1
> tools/rtems-binutils-2.31.1
> tools/rtems-gcc-7.4.0-newlib-2ab57ad59bc35dafffa69cd4da5e228971de069f
> tools/rtems-tools-5-1
> tools/rtems-kernel-5
>
> I assume it would be OK to change:
>
> tools/rtems-binutils-2.31.1
> tools/rtems-gcc-7.4.0-newlib-2ab57ad59bc35dafffa69cd4da5e228971de069f
>
> back to:
>
> tools/rtems-binutils-2.30
> tools/rtems-gcc-7.3.0-newlib-3.0.0
>
> I am going to attempt this, but if there is a better way, I would more
> than happy to try it.
>

If the files you are referencing haven't been removed, then this should
work. But checking out the RSB from the appropriate date would be better.




>
> regards,
>
> Ian C.
>
>
> On 11/01/2019 2:59 pm, Ian Caddy wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We have progressed with our RTEMS5 project using the imx6ULL, and are
> > getting closer to completing it, but we have been using linux tools
> > since around July18 and now need to create msys2 tools for our customer.
> >
> > I have created the tools on msys2 around mid-december as they needed
> > gdb earlier, and am only finally getting around to testing the rest of
> > the tools, building our snapshot of RTEMS5 and libbsd.
> >
> > There have been some changes in the tools between July to December,
> > and I had to do a small tweak to get our snapshot of RTEMS 5 working.
> >
> > Then I tried to build our July snapshot of libbsd, but this has proven
> > to be a lot more difficult.  I then tried the latest libbsd and am
> > facing different but similar build issues.  Things like <poll.h> need
> > to be <sys/poll.h> and things like that.  Even then this is the
> > standard libbsd and not our custom version which will then need to be
> > put together.
> >
> > So, I am wondering if it is possible to use the rtems-source-builder
> > to build a particular version of the tools (for example from July 18)
> > that we have been using on linux.
> >
> > I have the source-builder logs from that time if anyone is interested,
> > or a nudge in the correct direction(I don't know much about
> > source-builder as it normally works straight out of the box!!), to get
> > this sorted?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Ian Caddy
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > users at rtems.org
> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20190111/42cbdeb0/attachment-0002.html>