Compilation error in compiling RISC-V bsps
Joel Sherrill
joel at rtems.org
Fri Nov 13 04:36:49 UTC 2020
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020, 8:49 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
> On 13/11/20 10:55 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:16 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org
> > <mailto:chrisj at rtems.org>> wrote:
> > On 13/11/20 3:00 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > > The tests that start with dl are dynamic loader tests. They require
> > architecture
> > > specific support which sometimes breaks. That's why there is a
> ticket until it
> > > gets addressed by someone. Things get fixed as either volunteers
> step up or
> > > someone gets funded to fix them.
> > >
> > > You should be to do "make -k" to ignore this error and continue
> or, more
> > > cleanly, add a ".tcfg" file to the BSP's config directory to
> specify that this
> > > test should be
> excluded. bsps/riscv/riscv/config/rv64imafd-testsuite.tcfg
> > which
> > > should need only one line:
> > >
> > > expected-fail: dl06
> > >
> > > There are lots of other .tcfg files to look at for examples.
> >
> > The expected fail state is a runtime state so the test still needs
> to build.
> >
> > So temporarily it needs to be exclude?
>
> I suppose it could if the ticket is updated to reflect the fact the test is
> disabled and the exclude is commented with the ticket number?
>
I was only suggesting this as a local fix for the poster. But that might be
acceptable if this is not fixed properly before the next 5.x release.
> Chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20201112/90f79b7e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the users
mailing list