Compilation error in compiling RISC-V bsps

somesh deshmukh someshdeshmukh07 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 13 06:20:09 UTC 2020


Hi Chris, Joel,

Thanks for all the comments/suggestions.
This issue exists with the released version 5.1 however when I tried with
the master branch source code, I did not faced this issue.

Regards,
Somesh

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:07 AM Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020, 8:49 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>
>> On 13/11/20 10:55 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:16 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org
>> > <mailto:chrisj at rtems.org>> wrote:
>> >     On 13/11/20 3:00 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> >     > The tests that start with dl are dynamic loader tests. They
>> require
>> >     architecture
>> >     > specific support which sometimes breaks. That's why there is a
>> ticket until it
>> >     > gets addressed by someone. Things get fixed as either volunteers
>> step up or
>> >     > someone gets funded to fix them.
>> >     >
>> >     > You should be to do "make -k" to ignore this error and continue
>> or, more
>> >     > cleanly, add a ".tcfg" file to the BSP's config directory to
>> specify that this
>> >     > test should be
>> excluded. bsps/riscv/riscv/config/rv64imafd-testsuite.tcfg
>> >     which
>> >     > should need only one line:
>> >     >
>> >     > expected-fail: dl06
>> >     >
>> >     > There are lots of other .tcfg files to look at for examples.
>> >
>> >     The expected fail state is a runtime state so the test still needs
>> to build.
>> >
>> > So temporarily it needs to be exclude?
>>
>> I suppose it could if the ticket is updated to reflect the fact the test
>> is
>> disabled and the exclude is commented with the ticket number?
>>
>
> I was only suggesting this as a local fix for the poster. But that might
> be acceptable if this is not fixed properly before the next 5.x release.
>
>
>> Chris
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20201113/f3685f7c/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list